CatalogDeck
FeaturesSolutionsPricingAboutContact
Case Studies10 min read

The ROI of Centralized Product Data

February 15, 2025

ROI of Centralized Product Data

Implementing a centralized PIM system requires investment. But what's the actual return? We analyzed data from OPE brands that made the switch, and the numbers are compelling.

The Cost of Decentralized Data

Before we look at ROI, let's understand what decentralized product data actually costs. One mid-sized OPE manufacturer we worked with calculated they were spending:

  • $180,000 annually on duplicate data entry across systems
  • $95,000 in customer service costs handling specification errors
  • $150,000 in lost sales due to missing or incorrect product information
  • $75,000 in marketing costs recreating or searching for existing assets
  • Countless hours of employee frustration and inefficiency

That's over $500,000 in direct, measurable costs—and that doesn't include opportunity costs or strategic limitations.

Case Study: Regional OPE Distributor

A regional distributor with 2,500 SKUs implemented CatalogDeck's custom PIM solution. Here's what happened in the first year:

Efficiency Gains

  • Time to add new products reduced from 4 hours to 45 minutes
  • Product data accuracy improved from 87% to 99.2%
  • Marketing team productivity increased 40%
  • Customer service inquiries about specifications dropped 65%

Revenue Impact

  • Online conversion rate improved 23% due to complete, accurate product information
  • Expanded to three new sales channels within 6 months
  • Dealer satisfaction scores increased, leading to 18% more orders

Cost Savings

  • Eliminated $120,000 in duplicate data entry costs
  • Reduced returns due to incorrect specifications by 40%
  • Saved $65,000 annually in content creation costs

Case Study: OPE Manufacturer

A manufacturer with 1,800 products across multiple brands saw even more dramatic results:

  • Time-to-market for new products cut by 6 weeks
  • Able to manage 30% more SKUs with the same team size
  • Syndication to dealer portals automated—saving 200 hours per month
  • Product content now available in 5 languages (previously only English)

The financial impact in year one: $387,000 in hard cost savings, plus an estimated $600,000+ in additional revenue from faster launches and expanded market reach.

Calculating Your ROI

Every business is different, but here are the key areas where OPE companies typically see returns from centralized product data:

Time Savings

Calculate hours spent on product data management, then estimate 30-50% reduction in time required.

Error Reduction

What do specification errors cost in customer service, returns, and lost sales? Most see 60-80% reduction in data errors.

Revenue Growth

Better product information drives higher conversion rates. Even a 5% improvement in conversion can have huge impact.

Channel Expansion

How many additional sales channels could you serve if syndication was automated? What's the revenue potential?

The Strategic Benefits

Beyond the hard numbers, centralized product data enables strategic capabilities:

  • Launch products faster than competitors
  • Scale operations without proportional headcount increases
  • Make data-driven decisions about product line optimization
  • Provide dealers and partners with better support tools
  • Adapt quickly to market changes and new opportunities

Typical Payback Period

Most OPE companies we work with see full payback on their PIM investment within 12-18 months. Companies with larger catalogs or more complex distribution often see payback even faster.

Calculate Your ROI

Let's analyze your specific situation and show you the potential return from centralizing your product data.

Request a Custom ROI Analysis

Product

  • Features
  • Pricing
  • Solutions
  • Changelog

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Careers
  • Contact

Resources

  • Documentation
  • Help Center
  • API Reference
  • Community

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Security
  • Compliance
CatalogDeck

© 2025 CatalogDeck. All rights reserved.